The Last of the Tudors & Other Things Friday, Aug 5 2011 

Its been well over a year since I have posted to this blog. What a different world mine is these 16 months later. The day after I posted the Dixie Carter memorial, Tammy, my wife, decided to move from our home. We are currently divorcing and that is why I have not been much of a blogger or genealogist for some time.

As I sit here half watching season 4 of The Tudors, I began thinking of Katherine “Kat” Champernowne-Ashley (or Astley – depending upon the historian). Kat, as she was referred to by the first Elizabeth, was the governess and friend of the Queen. Lady Ashley is a probable member of our family tree, though a distant cousin to me.

It seems odd to me that very little is known of this woman. Historians cannot even decidedly determine her parentage, and this woman was the decades long companion of, at the time, the most powerful woman in the world.

••••

The photo albums on the website are on their way out! This was not my decision, but the decision of Apple, Inc. with their upcoming implementation of iCloud. (By the way, I need to find a web server, too.) But, the albums, with their ease of use in posting through the current MobileMe are going to be a pain to replace. Those are huge files and occupy lots of space.

••••

I am considering the loss of Family Tree Maker, too. I thought with the implementation of a Mac version, I would find computing happiness. Instead I found Heaven’s slowest implementation of the Mac UI. Think MacFamilyTree may be back on the menu.

Goodbye, Southern Belle Sunday, Apr 11 2010 

Dixie Virginia Carter-Holbrook ~ 1939-2010

Condolences to Hal Holbrook and the rest of her family.

Making Something Old, Something New Again Tuesday, Mar 16 2010 

While I was doing some computer work this morning, I came across a file I hadn’t read for years. The document, A Genealogy of the Sedgwick Family in America Since 1635, is the first ‘book’ about our family I read.

I remember it from years ago when I was a child and either my grandmother or great grandmother came across it amongst things belonging to my grand aunt Helen. Helen was sort of the family genealogist of her day and for the most part had a great deal of family history committed to memory. Her original document came from the genealogist, Francis Sedgwick. They met at sometime in the 30’s and, on the back of a Maple City Dairy letterhead, made a rudimentary family tree, while the front of the letterhead contained Francis’ notes.

wpid-0103a-kxetqescwb7e.jpg

wpid-103b-541mgliz8kto.jpg

These notes and family tree created the basis for Sedgwick2Graham.com. Years passed between the time I saw this information as a child and revisited many years later at Dennis Sedgwick’s wonderful site, Sedgwick.org. During one of my many, many trips to the site, I pilfered the 1934 Sedgwick documents and skimmed through it. I remembered the old copy of this document my family had. It has been lost to time or is relegated to a dusty corner of an attic, somewhere.

As I looked through the document last night, I thought it would be good for it to be searchable. While it is but a smattering of the family tree, it is a great resource for those interested in the family history and the notes and thoughts of earlier researchers. Sadly the old typewritten copy is far from being able to be OCR-ed into a computer. Adobe Acrobat is also not able to create a properly searchable document with it. So, I have decided to make a project of the document.

I will begin typing it, in between web and family tree updates. It will take some time – I am not the greatest typist in the world – but I think the end result will be worth it.

What happens when? Saturday, Mar 13 2010 

Recently, while doing some research I found some disturbing information about a family member.

The information I uncovered was horrendous. It is something that could have an effect on several other members of my family and is something that deserves not to see the light of day until well after the deaths of all those impacted by this event. But, it is also something that cannot be hidden away and one day need to be observed.

I found the information while doing a newspaper search to find an obituary. When I did the search, a who string of articles came up that detailed the heinous acts of this family member. I read the articles and I have been so upset that I have been physically ill. The first night I read them, I cried for a couple of hours.

There are things that we each will find when doing family research that can be embarrassing or disastrous to family members. Revealing these facts to other family members, or to those involved, is not the job of the family genealogist. However, I don’t rightly know what the right thing to do is.

I can never be thought of as the ideal parent, partner or friend. I have a multitude of flaws and I am an ass. I always have been. I am consistent. I don’t go out of my way to make life worse for others and I never deliberately harm others. That’s why I can’t reveal what I’ve found.

The legal system took care of the person in question, and I guess, the got what they deserved. There is still an obligation to history and honesty for this information to one day be released. Each person needs to decide when to tell about a family horror. There are different things accepted differently by different families.

However, in my case that day will be up to my heirs.

Happy Researching!

Family Trees for Sale by Tom Alciere Wednesday, Dec 16 2009 

Tom Alciere, a New Hampshire Libertarian politico, has for sale his genealogy websites. This could prove a good thing for those of us who are seriously into genealogy. Because hopefully, the future owners will not be wholesale posting family information not owned by them.

Mr Alciere did that to me. His defense against this theft is that my gedcom was publicly available and that his site links back to mine. Yah, it was and he did, but my website clearly states that the information is not to be used in a commercial fashion. When your looking at collecting a paycheck from Google AdSense, that makes this a commercial venture Mr. Alciere.

On his personal website, tomalciere.com, he makes the following statement:

“One thing is absolute: Drug control has to end. The government has no right to impose drug control laws on a person who never consented to them. If you feel otherwise, you are entitled to your opinion, but your opinion is absolutely wrong. You are hereby notified that your wrong opinion is totally rejected by the supporters of liberty.

“So how do you want drug control to be ended in New Hampshire, with ballots or with bullets?

“If you prefer ballots, then vote for the candidates who want to end drug control. But if you prefer bullets, you can vote against them. Just don’t come whining to me when your favorite cops get themselves killed in action waging the government’s War on Drugs against your neighbors. If you voted for it to happen, you didn’t pull the trigger, but you pulled the lever.

“On 4 December 2002, a gentleman in Frayser, Tennessee fought back in legitimate self-defense during a drug raid. A deputy sheriff was fatally gunned down. The deputy was killed in the act of his own deliberate wrongdoing, trying to enforce unjust laws. His choice.

“The cops keep right on pulling stunts like that, so obviously they still haven’t learned their lesson yet, but have you learned yours?

“Of course, you can pretend to think that your government has a right to impose drug laws, but that won’t stop your favorite cops from getting themselves killed trying to enforce them. You have been notified that your wrong opinion has been totally rejected by the supporters of liberty.

“Actions have consequences. Vote wrong, cops die. So don’t vote wrong. “

With the number of police officers, military, and politicians who truly tried to make this a better country that came from my family, this man in no way needs to be involved with our heritage.

Notes from Ada Arvilla Hamley Pearsall Saturday, Sep 26 2009 

Originally posted at Sedgwick2Graham.com in early 2008.
Last night, after I finished moving all the pictures to their new home, and writing my story about Ann Owram, I went to my e-mail to find a letter from Ray Todd Knight.

He is a descendant of the Wright family through Francis Wright, daughter of Thomas P. Wright and Ann Owram-Wright (from his note, I believe he is Thomas and Ann’s great, great, great grandson). He sent, with his letter, a copy of some notes from Ada Arvilla Hamley – Pearsall and a couple of photos, including the one below.

Ada was a first cousin of William Orum Wright, my great grandfather. I have seen her middle name spelled differently as either Arville and Arvilla. I have left the spelling as written by Ray.

e4105aa1-c966-4304-8bea-76f6003fafec.png

William Henry Hamley & Francis Wright-Hamley and family

Ada would be the girl on the far right of the photo

Notes from Ada Arvilla Hamley Pearsall

Grand Mother Wright was Ann Oram before she married Grand Father Thomas P. Wright. They must have married around 1835. She was born in Lankashire, England and was one half Irish. Her grandfather was from Ireland, her mother English.

Thomas P. Wright lived in the old Wright Estate near Manchester, England. I think his father’s name was also Thomas. He married Nellie Pinington. They had three children, Thomas P., Allen, and Annie. They went to school in Manchester, where they had sand boxes to learn to make their letters.

Our Grandfather and Grandmother had five daughters and three sons. First two daughters born in England. The first one died. Her name was Libbie, and they named their second daughter Libbie also. I have no dates anyway. There was Libbie, Mary Ann, Thomas, Will, Allen, James, Fanny, and Frank by a second marriage.

I think they must have moved to America around 1840 and lived in Waukegon, IL, near Chicago. I think most of the children were born there, but later moved to Ripon, WI, where mama was born.

Elizabeth (Libbie) married John Holbrook and their children were Ellen, Fanny, Eliza, Clara, Thomas, John and Joel. She, Libbie, married in WI when mama was only a baby and moved to Salt Lake City, Utah. I guess she had a harder life and more experience then any of them. She was only 16 when she left WI and moved by ox team. They went with the Mormons, but they weren’t Mormons themselves, but went with them for protection as there would be great chains of wagons and had a Dr with them. Of course, it was a terrible long journey and Libbie got her hip broken along the way. They lived in Salt Lake City for several years and then moved to Salmon City, Idaho. Then, one year the indians were so bad they had to live in a stockade for protection. She lived to be over 80. Her name should be mentioned in the history of Idaho, as she, with some other women, made all by hand the flag of Idaho when it was admitted as a state.

Mary Ann married a Haugh, lived in Ohio and had two daughters, Emma and Bertha.

Allen married a Hunt, also lived in Ohio and had one son, Leon.

Thomas married Rosina Knespd and had two daughters, Nellie and Grace. Nellie married Jake Ellis, Laud McFarland.

Will Wright married Flora Rarndon. Their children were Thomas (Tom), Bertha, Eva, Willie and Libbie (twins), and Clara. They lived in Ohio, then came to Tennessee some time back, then moved back to Ohio.

Uncle Jim married Emily Skinner of WI. Their children were Harvey, Albert, Alice, James, Martha and Nettie. They lost two babies.

Fanny married William Henry Hamley and had Ada Arvilla, Charles Andrew and Franklin.

Uncle Frank by Grandfather’s second marriage married Elizabeth Miller and had two children, Nathan and Louise.

Uncle Tom and Jim moved to South Dakota and took claims along about 1874. Later Uncle Jim moved to Tennessee.

Ada Arvilla Hamley Pearsall

I do know Ada was in communication with my great-grandparents. I have a letter from her to them from the 60′s, and my grandmother has mentioned her when we have talked about the history of the family.

It’s also nice to finally find out where the wrongly stated Rarndon maiden name for my great great grandmother came from. I don’t know that Ada actually made the mistake or if it was made by the person reading her handwriting (if these notes weren’t typed). Ada’s handwriting in the letter I have is difficult to read. and I can see how someone could make that mistake.

I don’t know if Ada was right about Flora and William living in Ohio, moving to Tennessee and moving back to Ohio. From what I have found they married and lived in Tennessee and relocated to Norwalk in about 1911.

Another thing that is interesting in the notes is the statement “Thomas P. Wright lived in the old Wright Estate near Manchester, England. I think his father’s name was also Thomas.” According to the British History Online website there was a Thomas Wright residing in Manchester during the early part of the 1800s whose occupation was Philanthropist. This does play into my theory that we are descended from this Thomas Wright line. (In 2008, I have found that was wrong. It appears, according to the 1841 England census, that there was no Wright Estate. Thomas and his father were wire weavers, living in very common circumstances in 1841. Thomas’ father was William Wright.)

The Story of Sister Mary Romilda Saturday, Sep 26 2009 

For the first time since I began the search into my history, I became moved spiritually by the finding of an unknown relative. I was researching a collateral branch of the family and came across Suzanne Bertsch. She was present in the 1910 census, but then seemingly disappeared.

I did a little more research and found her to be a Catholic Nun. She was a member of the Sisters of Notre Dame, in the Immaculate Heart of Mary Province at Covington, Kentucky. She served our religion for seventy of her nearly 90 years and no matter what I write, I cannot write anything nearly as beautiful as the words written in her obituary, or the thoughts from the homily of her nephew, the Reverend Leo Schmidt at her Burial Mass.

Before their writings, I would like to say that the thoughts written for the Sister made me examine my own spirituality and begin practicing the faith I have been away from for more than a decade. Sometimes, in examining our history, we find we can learn some important lessons from our own past.

I also want to take a moment to thank Sister Joan Terese Niklas, S.N.D., archivist for the Sisters of Notre Dame in Covington, Kentucky, for all of the assistance she has provided.

97f38b5b-07f2-4644-a379-006f6eef4216.png

Some thoughts from the Homily of Reverend Leo Schmidt at the Mass of Christian Burial for Sister Mary Romilda, S.N.D. – Aug. 17. 1987

In Biblical literature we often find the word “tent”. These were the dwelling places of nomads so they could be picked up and carried off to other lands when they were routed by their enemies or in peaceful times had to find better pasture lands for their flocks. Even John in his Gospel says God came to pitch His tent on earth with us so as to dwell with us. Paul says: “We know that when the earthly tent in which we dwell is destroyed, we have a dwelling provided for us by God, a dwelling in the heavens, not made by hands but to last forever.”

Sister Mary Romilda had thirty-three nephews and very many grandnieces and nephews. To all of us we find the above as appropriate. We saw Sister as one who traveled lightly. She had many different assignments. She knew where she was going, and she was a woman who knew what her life was about; she went in obedience. She loved her Community, her Church, her God, and she loved the many people she knew far and wide.

There are many stories we could tell about her. Maybe I could just recall a few that symbolize her life. I can remember sitting on the porch in Linwood, feeding the birds, or drinking fresh lemonades at St. Augustine’s in Covington; visiting her in Augusta so close to the river or visiting her in Bardstown where she was assisting the old people; or reading her letters about the floods in Harlan or her teaching the Indians in Winnebago. She was in many places and she always loved children. She had a special talent for teaching them, which she loved to do.

Just this past July Fourth there came to visit her a gentleman whom she taught in the sixth grade in Cheviot. Sister told me, “He recalled a terrible downpour and the drains got clogged up. He was surprised I didn’t even call the janitor but instead put on my blue apron and worked and worked until I had it cleaned out. I have no recollection of the incident. We might ask what opening up drains has to do with spreading God’s kingdom. We are all engaged in doing the important things, but it was typical of Sister to do the things that had to be done, not bothering about whether anyone saw it. I see her as someone who loved God, doing every day what she was expected to do, with a smile on her face.

Our family all loved to visit her wherever she was for it was always a treat to be with her and there were so many ways in which she pleased us. In later years when she was able to make home visits, she loved our big family reunions. She remembered every one and whom they went with and what they were interested in. It was her gift to love life, and she never forgot anniversaries and special occasions. When she couldn’t be there, she remembered us with letters and always decorated it, using crayons to make lilies or roses, etc. so that it would be something personal from her.

As we bid her goodbye tonight, we all know we have something to celebrate–her living religious life for seventy years. Every job is important, but there are few jobs with the lasting influence of thousands of young people who went through her classroom. She certainly has something beautiful to bring along with her to God. How she appreciated her Community and how much she enjoyed her Jubilee celebration less than a week before her death! Scripture tells us there is a special feast prepared for us. She has folded up her tent and gone to God because she saw God as her Truth and her Life, and she never wavered in her trust of the deep peace that we believe she now has and enjoys.

Obituary of Sister Mary Romilda Bertsch

The joyfully expectant Advent season of 1897 witnessed the arrival of little Suzanne into the family of Frank and Appolonia (Hoffman) Bertsch, whose home was situated in the one-time small country hamlet of Cold Spring, Kentucky. Two brothers and a sister were there to welcome her on that December 9, and four more children arrived in after years to complete the happy family circle. One boy eventually became a Franciscan priest, Reverend Luke Bertsch, now deceased. Suzanne was baptized at St. Joseph Church and also attended the parish school when of age.

Although Suzanne did not receive her First Holy Communion until she was 13 years of age, she was prepared for her First Confession in grade two. At that time all went to Confession in the German language, a custom which devastated Suzanne and caused bitter tears to flow on the evening prior to her day–she didn’t know how to confess her sins in German! But her good mother came to the rescue by delegating her older brother, the future Father Luke, to assist her. During the years following, she displayed an inclination toward the sisterhood by playing school, dressing like a sister with an ingenious type of headgear and a rosary dangling by her side, building and decorating altars. Cognizant of this attraction her father provided a stationary altar in the dining room cupboard where the family began to gather for the evening rosary.

Thus the years passed enveloped in that beautiful Catholic atmosphere of wholesome family life, love of God and of one another, an atmosphere enabling Suzanne to transform her childish attraction toward religious life into a mature reality. Through the advice of her teacher, Sister Mary Euphrasia, S.N.D., Suzanne and her lifelong companion, Hilda Kroger (deceased Sister Mary Irenas), joined the Aspirant school in Covington in the autumn of 1913 and entered the novitiate on February 2, 1915.
Already as a postulant she taught at St. Joseph Heights School and jokingly remarked that she was getting her dally exercise by walking from 5th Street to the Heights and back again–quite a distance!

Suzanne was invested on July 13 receiving the name of Sister Mary Romilda, and made her first vows on July 17, 1917. Thereafter, her teaching apostolate extended to our schools in the Covington Diocese and the Cincinnati Archdiocese. Sister also spent several years at St. Augustine Indian Mission in Winnebago, Nebraska in the capacity of teacher and matron. (We no longer staff this Mission.) When our Kentucky apostolate expanded to embrace the Appalachian Mountain area, Sister became a pioneer at Holy Trinity School in Harlan, fulfilling the roles of teacher, principal and local superior. Her last year of activity was spent at St. Monica Parish in Bardstown, Kentucky where she was engaged in catechetical instruction and ministering to the poor in the area.

Sister Mary Romilda retired to the provincial House in 1975 continuing to render services wherever possible, always with her typical heart-warming smile. Since walking had become more difficult because of her arthritic condition, Sister joined the Lourdes Hall (infirmary) community in 1982 still eager to proffer her services, interested in all things and retaining her pleasant disposition, which had captivated people throughout the years. She delighted in reading and in reminiscing about her days as a teacher. Precious in her sight was the book containing the names of all the children she had taught, and her daily prayers for them was truly a litany of intercession with the Good God.

In November of 1985 her brother, Father Luke, OFM, died at the age of ninety and sister was able to attend the Funeral Liturgy at St. Francis Seraph Church in Cincinnati, but after that there was a steady decline in her health. When the year 1987 dawned, Sister Mary Romilda felt certain she would not live to celebrate the 70th anniversary of her Profession in July, but the Lord had other plans. Our community celebration of all the Jubilees was held on June 20 and thereafter Sister’s thoughts centered persistently on death and she requested the sisters to pray the prayers for the dying with her. Since she also expressed the desire to receive the Sacrament of Anointing, her nephew, Rev. Leo Schmidt, came on June 22 to administer that special grace. She rallied somewhat after the Anointing and even though she was anxious to go home to God and her usual parting words to visitors were, “This might be the last time you’ll see me alive,” she now did want to be with us for the public jubilee celebration on August 8. The great day came and even though she could not participate in the Eucharistic Liturgy at our neighboring St. Agnes Church, she did enjoy the visit with her relatives.

The last days preceding death were dominated by a state of confusion as she talked almost constantly, reliving the past events of her life especially classroom episodes. In the dawning hours of August 14, sometime between 4 and 6 a.m., our dear Jubilarian of Grace smiled her lovliest and slipped off to heaven silently and alone to meet her Bridegroom of 70 years.

Mass of Christian Burial was concelebrated on August 17 at 7:30 p.m. by Rev. Leo Schmidt, Rev. Charles Weber and Rev. James Ryan. In attendance were her sister, Elizabeth Schmidt, her brothers Charles, Lawrence and Louis, many nieces and nephews, friends and sisters.

The homily was delivered by Father Schmidt who said in part: “I saw Sister as someone who traveled lightly. She knew where she was going and she was a woman who knew what life was all about; she went in obedience. She loved her Community, her Church, her God, and she loved the many people she knew far and wide….She always loved children and had a special talent for teaching them….I see her as someone who loved God, doing every day what she was expected to do, with a smile on her face. She loved her big family and its reunions. It was her gift to love life, and she never forgot anniversaries and special occasions….As we bid her goodbye tonight, we all know we have something to celebrate–her living religious life for seventy years. Every job is important, but there are few jobs with the lasting influence of thousands of young people who went through her classroom. She certainly had something beautiful to bring along with her to God….She has folded up her tent and gone home to God because she saw God as her Truth and her Life, and she never wavered in her trust of the deep peace that we believe she now has and enjoys.”

That Father was keenly aware of his aunt’s sterling qualities is quite evident from the above. The community as a whole reiterates his words in paying tribute to our dear sister who will continue to remember each of us before the throne of God just as she did her beloved pupils here on earth.

May she rest in peace!

A Leader for the Rebellion Saturday, Sep 26 2009 

ba388fae-ee6c-4186-8140-83d3f9f76442.png

One of the more interesting stories I have found during my research of our family history is that my generations 15th Great Grandmother was Margaret Wyatt. While she may be little more than a footnote in the history of the world, she was a Lady in Waiting to King Henry VIII’s wife Anne Boleyn, her nephew had quite a bit of impact on the history of England. With some help from Wikipedia, I shall tell you the story.

He was Thomas Wyatt, a rebel leader during the reign of Queen Mary I of England; his rising is traditionally called Wyatt’s rebellion. He is also known as Wyatt the Younger.

He was born at Allington Castle, the only son of Sir Thomas Wyatt, the famous poet, by Elizabeth Brooke, daughter of Thomas Brooke, 3rd Lord Cobham. The Duke of Norfolk was his godfather. At the age of fifteen he became a squire at the court of King Henry VIII, and Joint Constable of Conisborough Castle. In the same year, his father was imprisoned after a feud with the king’s brother-in-law, Charles Brandon, 1st Duke of Suffolk and on the false charge of being Anne Boleyn’s lover.

Anne Boleyn was beheaded on May 19, 1536. Thomas’s father was later released, but re-imprisoned in 1541 and only released after the intervention of Queen Catherine Howard. Thomas himself married Jane Hawte, daughter and co-heiress of Sir William Hawte of Bishopsbourne, by whom he had several children. He is also known to have had an illegitimate son, whose mother Elizabeth was a daughter of Sir Edward Darrell of Littlecote.

He was brought up a Roman Catholic. However, he is said to have been turned into an enemy of the Spaniards by witnessing the activities of the Spanish Inquisition while accompanying his father on a mission to Spain. On his father’s death in 1542, he inherited Allington Castle and Boxley Abbey. He served in the war against France, and was knighted in 1547. During the reign of King Edward VI, he was arrested for breaking windows while drunk. He was tried before the Privy Council and imprisoned in the Tower of London.

On his release, Wyatt went to fight for the Habsburg emperor (who was also king of Spain), Charles V in Flanders, obtaining further valuable military experience. In 1543 he took part in the siege of Landrecies, and in the following year was at the siege of Boulogne.

Returning to Allington, he lived quietly until the uprising by the Duke of Northumberland, to put Lady Jane Grey on the throne. Escaping punishment by Queen Mary, he took no further part in politics until Mary’s plans to marry Philip the prince of Spain, later Philip II of Spain, became known. In 1554 he joined with the conspirators who combined to prevent the marriage. A general movement was planned; but his fellow-conspirators were timid and inept, the rising was serious only in Kent, and Wyatt became a formidable rebel mostly by accident. On January 22, 1554 he summoned a meeting of his friends at his castle of Allington, and January 25 was fixed for the rising.

On January 26 Wyatt occupied Rochester, and issued a proclamation to the county. The country people and local gentry collected, but at first the queen’s supporters, led by Lord Abergavenny and Sir Robert Southwell, the sheriff, appeared to be able to suppress the rising with ease. But the Spanish marriage was unpopular, and Kent was more affected by the preaching of the reformers than most of the country districts of England. Abergavenny and Southwell were deserted by their men, who either disbanded or went over to Wyatt, who now had 3,000 men at his command. A detachment of the London trainbands sent against him under the command of the Duke of Norfolk also joined the rebels, raising their numbers to 4,000, and the Duke was forced to return to London.

The rising now seemed so formidable that a deputation was sent to Wyatt by the queen and council to ask for his terms. He insisted that the Tower should be surrendered to him, and the queen put under his charge. The insolence of these demands caused a reaction in London, where the reformers were strong and were at first in sympathy with him. When he reached Southwark on February 3 he found London Bridge occupied in force, and was unable to penetrate into the city. He was driven from Southwark by the threats of Sir John Brydges (or Bruges), afterwards Lord Chandos, who was prepared to fire on the suburb with the guns of the Tower.

He could not find boats for crossing into Middlesex or Essex, so he marched his force up the river to Kingston, where he found the bridge destroyed. They repaired it and crossed the Thames, and made his way to Ludgate with a part of his following. Some of his men were cut off, others lost heart and deserted. His only hope was that a rising would take place, but the loyal forces kept order, and after a futile attempt to force the gate Wyatt surrendered.

He was brought to trial on March 15, and could make no defence. Execution was for a time delayed, no doubt in the hope that in order to save his life he would say enough to compromise the queen’s sister Elizabeth, afterwards Queen Elizabeth, in whose interests the rising was supposed to have been made. But he would not confess enough to render her liable to a trial for treason. It was only through Elizabeth’s dignity and composure that she managed to escape from the scandal unharmed, although she was spied upon and placed under house arrest for the rest of her sister’s reign.

He was executed on April 11, and on the scaffold expressly cleared the princess of all complicity in the rising. After he was beheaded, his body was quartered.

His estates were afterwards partly restored to his son, George, the father of the Sir Francis Wyatt (d. 1644) who was governor of Virginia in 1621–26 and 1639–42. A fragment of the castle of Allington is still inhabited as a farm-house, near Maidstone, on the bank of the Medway.

A Life in Poems Saturday, Sep 26 2009 

2ec044b3-bde0-4a29-a7b1-a62d3882a105.png

“Plucking Scales from Eyes” – that’s what truthteller Bill Wright titles a poem contrasting the daily corporate papers with the leftist political weekly. Simple passion, remarkable clarity, precise insights mark this record of picket lines, devoted love, tough choices, steadfast activism, deep pleasures and powerful truths. This is a record to be wholly admired: one decade after another of reliable observation and intensely felt emotion. Wright has always woven experience into wisdom. I have often thought, “It would have been great to know Bill in his incarnations as farmer, boxer, family man, organizer, and unionist.” Now we have the record. Here is a spirit who easily embraces the poetic enthusiasm of Walter Lowenfels, the radical ministry of Maurice McCracken, as easily as the struggles of the current moment. Here, finally, is the book that tells the tale. This is the book you have been waiting for, too.

– David Shevin, author of Three Miles from Luckey

This is my Great Uncle William Wright’s book. It can be purchased from the Publisher’s Website.

The Story of Thanksgiving Saturday, Sep 26 2009 

8c9efe83-2377-4a88-89c2-fe69b0bf6cd8.png

According to Wilstar.com, this is the story of Thanksgiving. I originally intended to write this myself, since so many of our ancestors were present during the founding of this country, but due to time constraints, I could not. Please, read on.

Most stories of Thanksgiving history start with the harvest celebration of the pilgrims and the indians that took place in the autumn of 1621. Although they did have a three-day feast in celebration of a good harvest, and the local indians did participate, this “first Thanksgiving” was not a holiday, simply a gathering. There is little evidence that this feast of thanks led directly to our modern Thanksgiving Day holiday. Thanksgiving can, however, be traced back to 1863 when Pres. Lincoln became the first president to proclaim Thanksgiving Day. The holiday has been a fixture of late November ever since.

However, since most school children are taught that the first Thanksgiving was held in 1621 with the pilgrims and indians, let us take a closer look at just what took place leading up to that event, and then what happened in the centuries afterward that finally gave us our modern Thanksgiving.

The Pilgrims who sailed to this country aboard the Mayflower were originally members of the English Separatist Church (a Puritan sect). They had earlier fled their home in England and sailed to Holland (The Netherlands) to escape religious persecution. There, they enjoyed more religious tolerance, but they eventually became disenchanted with the Dutch way of life, thinking it ungodly. Seeking a better life, the Separatists negotiated with a London stock company to finance a pilgrimage to America. Most of those making the trip aboard the Mayflower were non-Separatists, but were hired to protect the company’s interests. Only about one-third of the original colonists were Separatists.

The Pilgrims set ground at Plymouth Rock on December 11, 1620. Their first winter was devastating. At the beginning of the following fall, they had lost 46 of the original 102 who sailed on the Mayflower. But the harvest of 1621 was a bountiful one. And the remaining colonists decided to celebrate with a feast — including 91 Indians who had helped the Pilgrims survive their first year. It is believed that the Pilgrims would not have made it through the year without the help of the natives. The feast was more of a traditional English harvest festival than a true “thanksgiving” observance. It lasted three days.

Governor William Bradford sent “four men fowling” after wild ducks and geese. It is not certain that wild turkey was part of their feast. However, it is certain that they had venison. The term “turkey” was used by the Pilgrims to mean any sort of wild fowl.

Another modern staple at almost every Thanksgiving table is pumpkin pie. But it is unlikely that the first feast included that treat. The supply of flour had been long diminished, so there was no bread or pastries of any kind. However, they did eat boiled pumpkin, and they produced a type of fried bread from their corn crop. There was also no milk, cider, potatoes, or butter. There was no domestic cattle for dairy products, and the newly-discovered potato was still considered by many Europeans to be poisonous. But the feast did include fish, berries, watercress, lobster, dried fruit, clams, venison, and plums.

This “thanksgiving” feast was not repeated the following year. Many years passed before the event was repeated. It wasn’t until June of 1676 that another Day of thanksgiving was proclaimed. On June 20 of that year the governing council of Charlestown, Massachusetts, held a meeting to determine how best to express thanks for the good fortune that had seen their community securely established. By unanimous vote they instructed Edward Rawson, the clerk, to proclaim June 29 as a day of thanksgiving. It is notable that this thanksgiving celebration probably did not include the Indians, as the celebration was meant partly to be in recognition of the colonists’ recent victory over the “heathen natives,” (see the proclamation).

A hundred years later, in October of 1777 all 13 colonies joined in a thanksgiving celebration. It also commemorated the patriotic victory over the British at Saratoga. But it was a one-time affair.

George Washington proclaimed a National Day of Thanksgiving in 1789, although some were opposed to it. There was discord among the colonies, many feeling the hardships of a few pilgrims did not warrant a national holiday. And later, President Thomas Jefferson opposed the idea of having a day of thanksgiving.

It was Sarah Josepha Hale, a magazine editor, whose efforts eventually led to what we recognize as Thanksgiving. Hale wrote many editorials championing her cause in her Boston Ladies’ Magazine, and later, in Godey’s Lady’s Book. Finally, after a 40-year campaign of writing editorials and letters to governors and presidents, Hale’s obsession became a reality when, in 1863, President Lincoln proclaimed the last Thursday in November as a national day of Thanksgiving.

Thanksgiving was proclaimed by every president after Lincoln. The date was changed a couple of times, most recently by Franklin Roosevelt, who set it up one week to the next-to-last Thursday in order to create a longer Christmas shopping season. Public uproar against this decision caused the president to move Thanksgiving back to its original date two years later. And in 1941, Thanksgiving was finally sanctioned by Congress as a legal holiday, as the fourth Thursday in November.

Next Page »

Follow

Get every new post delivered to your Inbox.